Quadrennial Defense Review Report » Quadrennial Defense Review Report »

Quadrennial technology review report dating,

Accordingly, it calls for a U.

Rolling Out the Quadrennial Technology Review Report

But although the QDR Report proclaims that the Army and Navy will remain capable of carrying out their missions, it leaves the fate of their modernization plans unclear. Noting that large U. The QDR Report takes a step in the right direction by replacing the old template of two regional wars with a new force-sizing construct of three different scenario clusters.

For most of the past decade, a main DOD clarion call for improving force capabilities has been transformation—the year process by which U. The one exception is its endorsement of a new air-sea battle concept for dealing with antiaccess threats, but currently this is an idea under study, not a tangible program for acquiring new capabilities.

Perhaps a bifurcated posture ref lects a natural evolutionary trend that responds to current events, but is it safe to assume that future conf licts will not require a close fusion of all three components?

Progress, however, is being made. Beyond this, it states, DOD will strive to ensure that requirements for all new major weapons are subjected to careful analysis and to certify that new technologies are sufficiently mature before the final costly phase of engineering and manufacturing development is launched.

It judges that the emerging security landscape requires a more widely distributed and adaptive U. Instead of highlighting the need for further progress, the QDR Report discusses the ground, naval, and air forces separately, largely in isolation from each other rather than in a joint context.

Simultaneously, DOD launched a major transformation agenda aimed at configuring its military forces with new information networks and other systems to wage the high-tech wars of the future.

In this way, openings for U.